What We’re Reading
Mercedes-Benz Gets Approval to Sell Level 3 Self-Driving Cars in California
Road & Track, July 9, 2023
What Tesla charging partnerships with Ford and GM mean for the EV industry
CNBC, July 9, 2023
US tells automakers not to comply with Massachusetts vehicle data law
Reuters, July 13, 2023
What We’re Reading
Tesla hit with ‘right to repair’ antitrust class actions
Reuters, March 15, 2023
PR Newswire, March 16, 2023
GM Is Fed Up Of Not Having Self-Driving Vehicle Rules In Place
CarBuzz, March 19, 2023
Who Owns Your Black Box Data? An Overview of U.S. EDR Laws and Regulations
Event Data Recorders (“EDR”) are regulated in the United States under 49 CFR § 563, which ensures that all EDRs record and collect data in a readily usable manner, and that car manufacturers provide commercially available mechanisms to retrieve crash and pre-crash data from EDRs. But who owns that data?
The federal Driver Privacy Act of 2015 limits data retrieval from EDRs and expressly rests ownership of EDR data with the owner or lessee of the vehicle. Specifically, it provides that “[a]ny data retained by an event data recorder (as defined in section 563.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations), regardless of when the motor vehicle in which it is installed was manufactured, is the property of the owner, or in the case of a leased vehicle, the lessee of the motor vehicle in which the event data recorder is installed.” 49 CFR § 24302(a)(“Limitations on Data Retrieval from Vehicle Event Data Recorders”).
Why Do We Care About “Right to Repair?”
“Right to repair” is receiving increased attention as the Biden Administration has made it a regulatory priority. In mid-2021, the President signed an Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy with the stated purpose of promoting “the interests of American workers, businesses, and consumers.” Among the many directives in the Order, the President directed the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission to consider exercising the Commission’s “statutory rulemaking authority” to address “unfair anti-competitive restrictions on third-party repair or self-repair of items.” Exec. Order § 5(h)(ii) (July 9, 2021).
Tags: